- #Windows 98 second edition product key list software
- #Windows 98 second edition product key list license
- #Windows 98 second edition product key list windows
#Windows 98 second edition product key list license
MS license the "works with windows" endorsement for the peripheral maker to put on the box. I found out about this last summer, about 6 weeks after NT workstation was dropped from support and I wanted to buy a new printer to hang on my old NT box. surely that is a far more shameful lack of support? After all, I don't see the same level of screaming about me being forced to switch my RedHat 7.0 and 8.0 boxes over to Red Hat Enterprise Linux. And the link to linux under the word "switch" is a good example of how biased this site has become. Typically enough though, this is Slashdot - every decision by Microsoft has to be wrong, evil, unthinkably unfair. I have some DOS 3 floppy disks lying around, surely I'm entitled to lifetime support for these!
#Windows 98 second edition product key list windows
You never know, there might be one or two Windows 3.1 users out there who still want hotfixes released. Or perhaps we should demand they support everything they make forever. Surely that's an impressive amount of supported products? Microsoft currently support Windows ME, 2000, 2003 and XP. Heck, there are still people using Win95! But can you really expect a company to invest in support for a product that is 3 generations out of date? For each OS a company (regardless of whether they're Microsoft, RedHat or Apple) it is necessary to have a testing environment, testing staff, developers, marketing, and who knows what else. Sure, there are lots of people out there using Win98 still.
#Windows 98 second edition product key list software
Operating Systems have a limited lifespan - don't tell me you hadn't noticed? RedHat doesn't support every single distribution they've ever compiled, and there's a reason for that: it's not the way the software industry works. I know sysadmins ARE NOT teachers and have other things to do, but they're not teaching a class of little fuckers forced to be there, They're MENTORING kids that want to do this and learn something, and who doesn't like mentoring someone who's motiveted and wants to learn somehting from the ground-up by doing the shitwork? Speaking of the older kids, why not make it an advanced class/lab to have them help admins do the migration. Kids that just need to get on a machine and do whatever can just login as "student."Īlso, cant you just make an NT/W2K/XP machine login as a specified user (like generic_student) on boot, anyway? My roommates XP machine doesnt make him login at all. Older kids can get their own user/passwd combos as needed. Noone ever filed a lawsuit claiming "my kid learned too much"
Kids in k12 are supposed to be there to learn and learn and learn some more. Those that use the argument "but they dont NEED to learn that for the future" should be slapped. Whats the harm in making all the little kids use the SAME login of "firstgrader:password"? Not only do you now instantly have a user on all the machines thats the same, but youre teaching them abuot logging in to an account, which they'll probably have to do anyway sometime in the future, and probably already do anyway if theres a netware system in the school.Īctually knowing what this means will make them more advanced users that 90% of their parents, if they weren't already. Just because a system requires a login doesnt make it bad.
Other than the cost of migrating, I dont understand how this can be bad for schools in the slightest. Luckily for them, microsoft fills their software with distracting bells and whistles. It's like if you buy a car that ends up with a recall for the seat belt, you get it fixed, and ten years later when you bring it in for a new muffler, they put back in the original, defective seat belt.īTW, if cars had as many defects and ran as poorly as windows, people would go back to riding horses. I do care if they pull the patches and updates that already exist. I don't care so much that they won't provide patches to any new exploits that are found after 5 years (providing they don't sue any white hats that fix them).
They then wield the power via copyright law and DMCA to prevent anyone from making them available to people who run win 98, thus forcing a paid upgrade. With windows 95 (and likely 98 now), Microsoft is removing the availability of critical updates (equivalent factory recalls). In the auto industry, any body shop can fix your door if it gets dented, and you don't face problems with patent owners preventing you from getting replacement parts.
0 kommentar(er)
